Subject | Firebird 2.0 and the ROWS clause |
---|---|
Author | Martijn Tonies |
Post date | 2006-11-08T14:49:06Z |
Hi,
As I'm going through the huge document called "Release Notes" for
Firebird 2.0, I noticed ROWS being implemented. Would I be
correct as to say that it doesn't include the optional [WITH TIES]
clause?
Martijn Tonies
Database Workbench - tool for InterBase, Firebird, MySQL, NexusDB, Oracle &
MS SQL Server
Upscene Productions
http://www.upscene.com
My thoughts:
http://blog.upscene.com/martijn/
Database development questions? Check the forum!
http://www.databasedevelopmentforum.com
As I'm going through the huge document called "Release Notes" for
Firebird 2.0, I noticed ROWS being implemented. Would I be
correct as to say that it doesn't include the optional [WITH TIES]
clause?
Martijn Tonies
Database Workbench - tool for InterBase, Firebird, MySQL, NexusDB, Oracle &
MS SQL Server
Upscene Productions
http://www.upscene.com
My thoughts:
http://blog.upscene.com/martijn/
Database development questions? Check the forum!
http://www.databasedevelopmentforum.com