Subject | Re: [firebird-support] Does Firebird have any plans on ODBMS |
---|---|
Author | David Johnson |
Post date | 2005-04-06T01:42:31Z |
The real world has gone to object relational mapping because OODB's
didn't work.
Java is going towards Hibernate, an ORM system that works against
"POJO's" (Plain Old Java Objects), without requiring the overheads and
gobbledegook of EJB's. Hibernate works transparently with Firebird 1.5,
and the really slick plugins for Eclipse take much of the grunt work
out of the mapping. Hibernate also allows you to maintain compatibility
with all major databases, so your deployed product is not married to any
specific DBMS platform - a consideration if you target the enterprise
market.
didn't work.
Java is going towards Hibernate, an ORM system that works against
"POJO's" (Plain Old Java Objects), without requiring the overheads and
gobbledegook of EJB's. Hibernate works transparently with Firebird 1.5,
and the really slick plugins for Eclipse take much of the grunt work
out of the mapping. Hibernate also allows you to maintain compatibility
with all major databases, so your deployed product is not married to any
specific DBMS platform - a consideration if you target the enterprise
market.
On Wed, 2005-04-06 at 01:18 +0000, james_027 wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Anyone here heard of object oriented database like CACHE? They say
> that object oriented database is better than Relational Database.
>
> James
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>