Subject | Re: [firebird-support] Does Firebird have any plans on ODBMS |
---|---|
Author | Alexandre Benson Smith |
Post date | 2005-04-06T01:35:55Z |
james_027 wrote:
That was hype some years ago, every major DB player are arguing that
it's DB was Object Relacional, Universal, Post-Relational, and a bunch
of other buzz-words.
I just see a lot of half-backed implementation over the SQL, that was
not more SQL, and couldn't get closer to anything really usefull.
I hope one day I could store my objetcs using some Persistence Layer
(maybe it will be called OODBMS, maybe Hibernate, maybe the
next-big-new-buzz-word), but I don't see it in a near future.
see you !
--
Alexandre Benson Smith
Development
THOR Software e Comercial Ltda.
Santo Andre - Sao Paulo - Brazil
www.thorsoftware.com.br
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.9.1 - Release Date: 01/04/2005
>Hi,Give it a try on a high load enviroment :-)
>
>Anyone here heard of object oriented database like CACHE? They say
>that object oriented database is better than Relational Database.
>
>James
>
>
That was hype some years ago, every major DB player are arguing that
it's DB was Object Relacional, Universal, Post-Relational, and a bunch
of other buzz-words.
I just see a lot of half-backed implementation over the SQL, that was
not more SQL, and couldn't get closer to anything really usefull.
I hope one day I could store my objetcs using some Persistence Layer
(maybe it will be called OODBMS, maybe Hibernate, maybe the
next-big-new-buzz-word), but I don't see it in a near future.
see you !
--
Alexandre Benson Smith
Development
THOR Software e Comercial Ltda.
Santo Andre - Sao Paulo - Brazil
www.thorsoftware.com.br
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.9.1 - Release Date: 01/04/2005