RAID has saved us from downtime a few times already. Hardware RAID is
as simple as configure the container and then go. If a drive fails then
it will warn you and you can hot-swap the bad drive and it will
automatically re-sync. Really no work to do. I strongly recommend it
for all production servers.

-steve

On Wed, 2005-10-12 at 21:45 +0200, Aage Johansen wrote:

> dry250 wrote:
> > I just would like to know what is the best shadowing the main
> database,
> > or using the RAID miroring technology ? in term of price,
> performence,
> > and of course what is the easiest to use in case of disk failure
> ( hte
> > easiest to detect the failure, the easiest to find back a normal
> state
> > after a failure? )
> >
> > If u have use have already use one of this technology (or better
> both
> > of them), can you explain what is the better for you, and why ?
>
> For performance and ease of use I would think the RAID solution is the
> one
> you want.
>
>
> --
> Aage J.
>
>
>
> ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
>
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> Visit http://firebird.sourceforge.net and click the Resources item
> on the main (top) menu. Try Knowledgebase and FAQ links !
>
> Also search the knowledgebases at http://www.ibphoenix.com
>
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]