Subject | Re: Nested Transactions |
---|---|
Author | Alexander V.Nevsky |
Post date | 2004-07-09T17:06:23Z |
--- In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com, "unordained"
<unordained_00@c...> wrote:
Sorry, but in this sense I don't understand why do you need
_sub_transactions. This is exactly the way of usage of transactions.
Best regards,
Alexander.
<unordained_00@c...> wrote:
> The main difference between the two is the concurrency of childtransactions. With sub-
> transactions, you could initiate multiple sub-transactions and workon all of them simultaneously.
Sorry, but in this sense I don't understand why do you need
_sub_transactions. This is exactly the way of usage of transactions.
Best regards,
Alexander.