Subject | Re: [firebird-support] Why the UDF are not integrated in the FB engine ? |
---|---|
Author | Boguslaw Brandys |
Post date | 2004-07-05T17:57:04Z |
Hi,
SUBSTRING is already integrated (I suppose), UPPER also working.
What about trim,upper,lower - I don't know, but string manipulation
consistent with SQL92 should be integrated,am I wrong ?
Boguslaw Brandys
Dnia Tue, 29 Jun 2004 22:52:33 +0200, Steffen Heil <lists@...>
napisał:
Best Regards
Bogusław Brandys
SUBSTRING is already integrated (I suppose), UPPER also working.
What about trim,upper,lower - I don't know, but string manipulation
consistent with SQL92 should be integrated,am I wrong ?
Boguslaw Brandys
Dnia Tue, 29 Jun 2004 22:52:33 +0200, Steffen Heil <lists@...>
napisał:
> Hi--
>
>> Somebody knows why the common UDF are not included inside the server
> engine?. I know is good that the functions are extendible, but if they
> are
> so commonly used, why not leave them inside the server already like
> Sysbase
> or MS SQL server do so???. How about a CRC function?
>
> Because it is simply not needed. Other servers do usually not have
> mechanisms like UDFs. For firebird, there is no (or at least) only a very
> cheap overhead for having these functions as UDFs. Why should there be
> anything more integrated into the core engine, as absolutely required?
>
> Anyway, I am not in the designer team of firebird. Maybe someone of them
> might answer more.
>
> Regards,
> Steffen
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
Best Regards
Bogusław Brandys