Subject Re: FB 1.5 Crash
Author precari0
--- In, Lester Caine <lester@l...>
> precari0 wrote:
> >>So yes I am stupid enough to believe it. Have you proven
> >>that SP4 IS stable in it's own right? We are not going to
> >>risk it again any time soon :)
> >
> > We have about 40 sites that may serve as proof. :)
> > They're all happy running FB1.0 24/7 on all sorts of
> > win32. From NT4SP6 to XPProSP1.
> But how many W2k SP4 ?
> We have some 100 sites with W98SE and NT4SP6, and a few W2k
> SP3, but the hardware on the W2k machines is obviously not
> compatible with SP4 so they will stay SP3 until we need to
> change the hardware ( 10 years is the current record for our
> W3.1 systems and still running solid ;) )

From the top of my head 8 for sure, but probably something
around 15.