Subject | Re: [firebird-support] Re: Interbase 6.X vs Firebird on Server 2003 |
---|---|
Author | Paul Reeves |
Post date | 2004-01-12T15:25:59Z |
On Monday 12 January 2004 15:35, Daniel Rail wrote:
reputation for making sure that a session has no idea it is not actually
running on real hardware.
Not that I'm denying even a single report. My problem isn't vmware, it is
a reliable stress testing application that can actually simulate
something like a live environment. My limited tests are so limited that
they are nothing more than a smoke test. On their own they neither
confirm nor deny a problem. Although, if a simple test could confirm the
problem it would be a damn sight easier to find a solution.
Paul
--
Paul Reeves
http://www.ibphoenix.com
Supporting users of Firebird and InterBase
>Nothing is impossible, but VMWare has, as far as I'm aware, a good
> There might be a difference with Win2003 running in VMWare and having
> Win2003 running exclusively(not with VMWare) on the system.
>
reputation for making sure that a session has no idea it is not actually
running on real hardware.
> There are reports that if you set Win2003 to optimize forIs that reports or report?
> applications, instead of services, Firebird does run faster.
> Apparently this is mainly due to the window that Firebird creates for
> IPC communication and for the guardian to detect that the server is
> running or not, and that maybe Win2003 recognizes Firebird more as an
> application than a service, because of that window.
>
Not that I'm denying even a single report. My problem isn't vmware, it is
a reliable stress testing application that can actually simulate
something like a live environment. My limited tests are so limited that
they are nothing more than a smoke test. On their own they neither
confirm nor deny a problem. Although, if a simple test could confirm the
problem it would be a damn sight easier to find a solution.
Paul
--
Paul Reeves
http://www.ibphoenix.com
Supporting users of Firebird and InterBase