Milan Babuskov wrote:

> Andrew Velikoredchanin wrote:
>
>>Alexander V.Nevsky wrote:
>>
>>
>>>--- In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com, Andrew Velikoredchanin
>>><andrew@r...> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>I test my big DB on this server (Windows 200 on 2xP3/512Mb RAM) and
>>>
>>>have
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>problem with deadlock:
>>>>"lock conflict on no wait transaction
>>>>violation of PRIMARY or UNIQUE KEY constraint "INTEG_980" on table
>>>>"ENTRYCORR_12000101"".
>>>>:(
>>>>With IB6, IB7 and FB 1.5-RC5 superserver this problem not present.
>>>
>>>
>>> Andrew, amount of telepathes here is not more than in our NG ;) As I
>>>said you earlier, nobody can say anything intelligible while you don't
>>>isolate conditions which provides this - statement, triggers on
>>>affected tables, procedures called by this triggers, another
>>>additional circuimstances if any exists.
>>>
>>
>>
>>Unfortunately, I am not the developer of this DB, therefore I can not
>>result exact characteristics of a DB. :(((
>
>
> DB or application?

DB and application.

> In any case, shouldn't you talk to developer then?

Realy, this test do developers. I talk with him. But since on other IB
versions all works, they did not begin to clarify details - on what is
concrete operations there is a failure.

> No one can't help you if we don't even know what *exactly* the problem
> is. We can just guess, and there can ba a million reasons, so it would
> be just a waste of time...
>

Yes, certainly. :(
I shall clarify details.