Subject | select ... for update: bug or feature? |
---|---|
Author | leu57 <Rainer.Leopold@schatz-mail.de> |
Post date | 2003-02-18T09:31:57Z |
Hi,
though a 'select ... for update' statement is allowed in
SQL and accepted outside an 'declare cursor' statement, it has no
effect on locking the selected row[s] as it has e.g. in ORACLE.
Since I have to connect to FIREBIRD and/or ORACLE from one
application, life would be easier if both would behave in the same
way.
So is this a 'misbehaviour' of firbird supposed to be changed or is
ORACLE (V8) to blame?
Regards,
Rainer Leopold
though a 'select ... for update' statement is allowed in
SQL and accepted outside an 'declare cursor' statement, it has no
effect on locking the selected row[s] as it has e.g. in ORACLE.
Since I have to connect to FIREBIRD and/or ORACLE from one
application, life would be easier if both would behave in the same
way.
So is this a 'misbehaviour' of firbird supposed to be changed or is
ORACLE (V8) to blame?
Regards,
Rainer Leopold