Subject | Re: [ib-support] FB, win support, super vs classic, QT.... |
---|---|
Author | Martijn Tonies |
Post date | 2002-08-08T06:41:50Z |
Hi Bryce,
course, a Win98/ME system is not suited as a database server platform
because of instability of the platform itself.
There are some "issues" with Windows XP System File Restore/Protection
whatever it is called, but nothing that can be solved.
If I were you, I'd put my bet on Win2000.
Classic is the 'older' architecture - it spawns a new process for each
connection.
Advantages:
- scales well on multi-processor systems
- if one connection goes ape, it can be killed
Disadvantages:
- no shared memory cache
- uses more memory
- no Serices API
SuperServer is the newer architecture and uses a multithreaded engine,
using a thread-pool (I believe) to handle connections.
Advantages:
- shared cache
- single process
- Services API for remote administration of users, backup/restore
Disadvantages:
- less memory to use
- currently not suited for multi-processor systems
Martijn Tonies
InterBase Workbench - the developer tool for InterBase and Firebird
http://www.interbaseworkbench.com
Upscene Productions
http://www.upscene.com
"This is an object-oriented system.
If we change anything, the users object."
> First, on the firebird website's FAQ it lists supported platforms,As far as I know, all version from Win98 upwards are supported. Of
> but does not mention win9x/2k/xp, but yet I see people talking about
> firebird being installed on win2k systems...so I went to the
course, a Win98/ME system is not suited as a database server platform
because of instability of the platform itself.
There are some "issues" with Windows XP System File Restore/Protection
whatever it is called, but nothing that can be solved.
If I were you, I'd put my bet on Win2000.
> download's section to see if I could get a win copy, the only windowsAs you noticed, there are two different "architectures" for Firebird.
> version, "super server", did not mention which version(s) of windows
> it supports. Can I get clarification on what windows platforms
> firebird is available on?
Classic is the 'older' architecture - it spawns a new process for each
connection.
Advantages:
- scales well on multi-processor systems
- if one connection goes ape, it can be killed
Disadvantages:
- no shared memory cache
- uses more memory
- no Serices API
SuperServer is the newer architecture and uses a multithreaded engine,
using a thread-pool (I believe) to handle connections.
Advantages:
- shared cache
- single process
- Services API for remote administration of users, backup/restore
Disadvantages:
- less memory to use
- currently not suited for multi-processor systems
> Also, I will need a Mac OS X version, which it shows as beingHope this helps,
> supported only by the "classic server" version. What is the
> difference between the superserver and classic server versions of
> firebird? I searched the firebird website and didn't see anything
Martijn Tonies
InterBase Workbench - the developer tool for InterBase and Firebird
http://www.interbaseworkbench.com
Upscene Productions
http://www.upscene.com
"This is an object-oriented system.
If we change anything, the users object."