| Subject | Re: [ib-support] FB 1 and INSERT INTO |
|---|---|
| Author | Nando Dessena |
| Post date | 2002-03-13T15:26:58Z |
Helen,
If the staments work in RC2 and not in 1.0, it's a Firebird issue, and a
big one.
Perhaps thousands of (IBO) applications are now unable to work with
Firebird.
FWIW, I don't know what the point of qualifying field names in insert is
in the first place, but a quick look at the SQL specification says it
should be possible (or, better, I haven'f found where it says it isn't
allowed).
Ciao
--
____
_/\/ando
> Sorry, non-ibo-people, this is mostly an IBO issue, I think, but forKeep it here, keep it here!
> perhaps one more test I will keep it here, since it seems to have been
> thrown up by some DSQL change between RC2 and Release 1...
If the staments work in RC2 and not in 1.0, it's a Firebird issue, and a
big one.
Perhaps thousands of (IBO) applications are now unable to work with
Firebird.
FWIW, I don't know what the point of qualifying field names in insert is
in the first place, but a quick look at the SQL specification says it
should be possible (or, better, I haven'f found where it says it isn't
allowed).
Ciao
--
____
_/\/ando