Subject | Re: [ib-support] System Table Inconsistency in IB6? |
---|---|
Author | Martijn Tonies |
Post date | 2001-05-29T21:22:50Z |
> >In rdb$types the value for an INT64 field (ie QUAD) is 9.value
> >
> >However a field defined as say numeric(18) (ie an INT64 field) has a
> >of 16 in rdb$fields.rdb$field_type.I think I've heard someone say they wanted to remove VAX (or other machine)
>
> Oh, brilliant. QUAD is the VAX equivalent of INT64 (aka long long, Java
> long, etc.)
> Apparently they decided they needed a different value for reasons obscure.
related types...
Obscure enough? :)
--
Martijn Tonies
InterBase Workbench - the developer tool for InterBase and Firebird
http://www.interbaseworkbench.com
Upscene Productions
http://www.upscene.com
"This is an object-oriented system.
If we change anything, the users object."