Subject | Re: [ib-support] Functions |
---|---|
Author | Nando Dessena |
Post date | 2001-10-19T10:13:50Z |
Helen,
connection, which would be a very bad idea.
seems a really useful thing WRT extending the server, but as I said the
disadvantages should be considered. That's why I asked.
BTW, the implementation of a couple more internal variables to hold the
current connection and transaction handle should be easy if not trivial.
Should we move this discussion to IB-Architect or IB-Priorities or such?
Ciao
--
____
_/\/ando
> I'd have to add "What for?"For letting UDF access data without the need for an additional
connection, which would be a very bad idea.
> and "What whole new worlds?"Being able to commit/rollback work done by a UDF, for example. To me, it
seems a really useful thing WRT extending the server, but as I said the
disadvantages should be considered. That's why I asked.
BTW, the implementation of a couple more internal variables to hold the
current connection and transaction handle should be easy if not trivial.
Should we move this discussion to IB-Architect or IB-Priorities or such?
Ciao
--
____
_/\/ando