Subject | Re: [firebird-python] Re: FDB 0.7.0 released |
---|---|
Author | Mario Lacunza |
Post date | 2011-12-21T15:54:08Z |
Hello Mariuz,
Im corious for what reasons you think GIT is better? I work with SVN
most of my projects but I want test GIT, so will be very appreciated
your comments.
Saludos / Best regards
Mario Lacunza
Email:: mlacunza@...
Personal Website:: http://www.lacunza.biz/
OpenOffice.org:: http://es.openoffice.org/
OpenOffice.org Perú:: http://openoffice-peru.com/
Hosting:: http://mlv-host.com/
Mascotas Perdidas:: http://mascotas-perdidas.com/
Google Talk: mlacunzav Skype: mlacunzav
MSN: mlacunzav@... Y! messenger: mlacunzav
El mié 21 dic 2011 10:15:45 PET, mariuz escribió:
Im corious for what reasons you think GIT is better? I work with SVN
most of my projects but I want test GIT, so will be very appreciated
your comments.
Saludos / Best regards
Mario Lacunza
Email:: mlacunza@...
Personal Website:: http://www.lacunza.biz/
OpenOffice.org:: http://es.openoffice.org/
OpenOffice.org Perú:: http://openoffice-peru.com/
Hosting:: http://mlv-host.com/
Mascotas Perdidas:: http://mascotas-perdidas.com/
Google Talk: mlacunzav Skype: mlacunzav
MSN: mlacunzav@... Y! messenger: mlacunzav
El mié 21 dic 2011 10:15:45 PET, mariuz escribió:
>
>
> --- In firebird-python@yahoogroups.com
> <mailto:firebird-python%40yahoogroups.com>, Pavel Cisar <pcisar@...>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> >
> > As promised, FDB initial release (0.7.0) is out:
> > http://pypi.python.org/pypi/fdb/0.7.0
> >
> > It's almost feature-complete (ready for 95% of users), but it could be
> > still buggy (it's beta!), and the code wasn't optimized for size and
> > speed. In all other ways it's ready for wide testing.
> >
> > What's missing:
> >
> > - Distributed transactions
> > - ARRAY support
> > - EVENTs support
> > - Stream BLOBs
> > - TRACE service
> > - Documentation (but you can use KInterbasDB one as FDB is as close to
> > it as possible).
> > - Python 3.x support (haven't had time to test it, but it shouldn't be
> > hard to make it work there)
> >
> > What's new since my last post here:
> >
> > - Support for stored procedures (proper one according to Python DB API,
> > behaviour is the same as in KInterbasDB)
> > - Prepared Statements. It works in exactly the same way as in
> > KInterbasDB, i.e. you can use explicit PS via cursor.prep(), or use the
> > internal PS cached for all statements executed via cursor.execute() - it
> > will detect previously executed command and re-use prepared statement
> > (cached per cursor instance!).
> > - Fully implemented cursor.description attribute, i.e. including
> > precision for DECIMAL/NUMERIC fields. Should now return the same results
> > as KInterbasDB.
> > - trans_info/transaction_info and db_info/database_info calls like in
> > KInterbasDB.
> > - Better object dependency and lifetime management, so Python memory GC
> > should be much happier now. I modelled it as much as KDB does it as
> > possible.
> >
> > Source code is also in Firebird Project's Subversion repository:
> > https://firebird.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/firebird/python/fdb
> >
> > (KInterbasDB source moved to
> >
> https://firebird.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/firebird/python/kinterbasdb)
> >
> > Sorry for GIT/Mercurial etc. fans, but Firebird project uses only SVN
> > for all its code (except old obsolete ones that are still in CVS) and it
> > would be pointless to create another type of repository for such a small
> > project. However, you're free to set up mirrors or local repositories on
> > GIT or whatever :)
> I will check with django if it works :)
>
> It's not about the mirrors it's about the contributions , it's a lot
> easier to contribute to github/git and faster too :)
>
> Anyway there not many contributors yet to kinterbase/fdb so i guess
> svn should suffice , on cvs i think is only firebird documentation left
>
>