Subject | Re: [Firebird-Java] Re: Back to XWiki and adoption in general |
---|---|
Author | Mark Rotteveel |
Post date | 2012-07-20T12:10:18Z |
On Fri, 20 Jul 2012 14:50:01 +0400, Arioch The <ariochthe@...>
wrote:
though, as we are probably going to discontinue that site.
depends on the exact API used, because some Windows filesystem APIs limits
it to about 260, while others don't have such a limit).
'standard' Java practice to me.
Mark
wrote:
> Well, thanks.real
>
> They are heading to 4.2 so i hope your work on 4.1.x would not be waste.
>
> I'd like to repeat, that while having made xbm's would be greate, the
> treasure would be logging a process into JB wiki.I will see what I can do. It probably won't end up on the Jaybird Wiki
though, as we are probably going to discontinue that site.
> BTW, i tried to cloen their git and found Git/Win is limited with 260That is unfortunately a limitation of Windows (although it actually
> letters file path :-(
depends on the exact API used, because some Windows filesystem APIs limits
it to about 260, while others don't have such a limit).
> Why Javists are so fond of nested redundant names ?would
> xxxx/xxxx-yyyy/xxxx-yyyy-zzzz/xxxx-yyyy-zzzz-1111/etc ?
>
> I wonder if their objects were named like the files and folders, what
> they say ?Not sure what you are talking about here, that doesn't really look like a
'standard' Java practice to me.
Mark