|Subject||thin jdbc-2 only (Re: Jdbc 2.0 Patches)|
> My own problem is that I am paranoid ;-) I just have thisNo, they just need to include some more classes in classpath. We do
> impression that those of us like myself, Leo and Blas (hope I have
> understood them both correctly) who need JDBC but not JCA are seen
> as people needing to be converted to JCA.
not have CCI (part of JCA) support simply because it conflicts with
> For me full standard JDBC support is about 2 billion times moreCurrently I see only one thing that might be improved (however I have
> exciting, important and interesting than any/all JCA support. In my
> paranoia I keep thinking you are saying that the jdbc driver is
> compromised due to the JCA support. Maybe that is not what you are
no idea how): autocommit support. Current implementation caches
result set in memory to model autocommit semantics. If somebody has
better idea how to use IB API, please post it here.
> I like the idea of multiple packages if it makes the code easier toI do not object repackaging. But I would first go for release (we're
> approach. I have not had time to do much but when I did look I am
> afraid that I got lost quite quickly.
quite close to it), then tag it as stable version, branch new version
and make repackaging/refactoring there (like FB people do with
> Hoping you understand my paranoia and therefore why messages likeOnly in discussion we can make driver better. You input is really
> the ones from Blas seem very important and significant to people
> coming from this point of view.
appreciated, and is very good motivation to continue development! We
see that our work is needed by others, not just to please our ego.