Subject | Re: JDBC Development |
---|---|
Author | alberola@bio.es |
Post date | 2001-04-27T08:05:40Z |
Hello,
I agree with you. The FireClient is a too general name that
could cover all the family of Firebird clients and is not
suitable for this Java client.
But this module won't be only a jdbc driver, it will be a
complete suite of client APIs writen in Java. You will be
able to write a Java application using GDS avoiding the
use of JDBC in some contexts where you need functionality
not found in a standard JDBC driver.
So, what about "jclient", "java-client" ?
And, what about "clients/java", "clients/phyton", ... ?
Bye.
Alejandro Alberola
I agree with you. The FireClient is a too general name that
could cover all the family of Firebird clients and is not
suitable for this Java client.
But this module won't be only a jdbc driver, it will be a
complete suite of client APIs writen in Java. You will be
able to write a Java application using GDS avoiding the
use of JDBC in some contexts where you need functionality
not found in a standard JDBC driver.
So, what about "jclient", "java-client" ?
And, what about "clients/java", "clients/phyton", ... ?
Bye.
Alejandro Alberola
--- In IB-Java@y..., Dave Warnock <david@s...> wrote:
> Given we might collect other clients for other languages eg
Pythonthen
> either we are saying this module contains them all OR we need to have
> Java or jdbc in the module name. Also is this not a jdbc driver rather
> than a java client. I would be happy with just jdbc as the module name.
>
> Dave