Subject Re: [IB-Java] Re: client-java driver pretty slow
Author David Jencks
This looks pretty interesting. I haven't looked at the progress of logging
recently, I understand theres a Logger in jdk 1.4 and log4j has adapted in
v 1.2 to be somewhat compatible. How does your stuff relate to these
developments?

I'd like to take a look anyway. I guess since logging is used by all the
packages we should put it in org.firebirdsql.logging? (I'm assuming you are
offering to contribute a version of your code to firebird?)

Thanks!

david jencks

On 2001.11.26 13:33:52 -0500 Paulo Gaspar wrote:
> I have a Common logger interface plus:
> - Adapter for Apache Jakarta LogKit;
> - Adpater for Log4J;
> - Simple console log implementation;
> (Realy easy to convert into a file implementation.)
> - NoOp log implementation (does nothing for production).
>
>
> The interface and the first 2 adapters are based on similar components
> form the Apache Jakarta Avalon project, after stripping out the
> Framework dependent bits.
>
> It is really simple and small code.
>
> Are you interested on this?
> If yes, under what package name do you want it?
>
>
> Have fun,
> Paulo Gaspar
>
>
> http://www.krankikom.de
> http://www.ruhronline.de
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Luca Lafranchi [mailto:luca.lafranchi@...]
> > Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 5:25 PM
> >
> >
> > > 1. The amount of logging is still kind of ridiculous for production
> > use. I
> > > am very tempted to use log4j to make the amount of logging
> configurable
> > > while running. How much outcry would there be towards adding this
> > library?
> >
> > No outcry at all (at least from me ;) ) But remember one thing: if
> > this driver is to be used in an applet environment it should be fast
> > downloadable: the more libraries you add, the bigger it becomes, the
> > slower it will be to download. I don't use it in an applet
> > environment, but others may want to...
> >
> >
> > >
> > > 2. To solve the "blob access outside of autocommit transaction"
> problem,
> > > how about putting each blob access in its own transaction (when
> > autocommit
> > > is happening)? I haven't looked but think this would be pretty easy
> to
> > > implement.
> >
> > Sorry, but I don't know much of driver implementation (shame on me!)...
> >
> > Good evening to all,
> > Luca
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> IB-Java-unsubscribe@egroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
>
>