Subject | Re: [Firebird-general] Re: Support for Tablespaces/Data-placement in Firebird? |
---|---|
Author | Ann W. Harrison |
Post date | 2009-09-21T15:55:19Z |
Tomneko-san,
less critical than it is for other databases matter? Should we
implement other useless features for check-off value - read uncommitted
transaction (a performance boost on non-MVCC engines, but just bad
data for us) or the MySQL file-system dependent rules for case
sensitivity?
own checklist, we'd look a lot better than if we rely on our
competitors to do it for us.
Ann
> IMHO in marketing aspect "Support for Tablespaces/Data-placement" is needed.Does the fact that the design of Firebird makes data placement much
less critical than it is for other databases matter? Should we
implement other useless features for check-off value - read uncommitted
transaction (a performance boost on non-MVCC engines, but just bad
data for us) or the MySQL file-system dependent rules for case
sensitivity?
>Sure. And if we had the marketting strength to put together our
> In japan, many users are using mysql and postgresql, firebired is
> comparing others always.
own checklist, we'd look a lot better than if we rely on our
competitors to do it for us.
>Cheers,
Ann