Claudio Valderrama C. wrote:

> The SF page
> https://sourceforge.net/awards/cca/
> leads to this:
> http://www.wilsonresearch.com/2006/ostgawards06/ostgawards2.php
> We weren't included.

They say: Top 40 projects based on activity.

I found sf.net activity stats quite inaccurate in the past, but perhaps
they fixed it now. Anyway, it leads to really strange selection of
software. I guess this will give the "most improved player" award
instead of MVP award at the end.

--
Milan Babuskov
http://njam.sourceforge.net
http://www.flamerobin.org