Subject | Resources and company involvement |
---|---|
Author | paulruizendaal |
Post date | 2005-04-30T17:07:58Z |
There is an interesting thread over at postgres, started of by Bruce
Momjian:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-advocacy/2005-04/msg00225.php
If you're interested, read the whole thread.
The picture I get is that the overall amount of developer resource
isn't very different from ours, regardless of what they say in
interviews.
Also, they come across as a bit disorganised. We may have our debates
over FB3 merge process, but overall we're focussed and have managed
to tie company involvement into the core project.
Our structure, with a Foundation, an admin committee and Dmitry
Yemanov as the trusted "keeper of the core" seems to work relatively
well.
We can be proud of ourselves!
Paul
Momjian:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-advocacy/2005-04/msg00225.php
If you're interested, read the whole thread.
The picture I get is that the overall amount of developer resource
isn't very different from ours, regardless of what they say in
interviews.
Also, they come across as a bit disorganised. We may have our debates
over FB3 merge process, but overall we're focussed and have managed
to tie company involvement into the core project.
Our structure, with a Foundation, an admin committee and Dmitry
Yemanov as the trusted "keeper of the core" seems to work relatively
well.
We can be proud of ourselves!
Paul