Subject | Re: OT: Delphi versions. |
---|---|
Author | Svein Erling Tysvær |
Post date | 2005-02-24T11:48:55Z |
--- In Firebird-general@yahoogroups.com, Lester Caine wrote:
commenting the bits that Claudio didn't think were possible to change,
but which may bring this whole tread "on-topic":
years ago, but in the end finally succeeded (to a large extent due to
IBO?). Doesn't that put you in a position where you're able to talk to
people burnt by InterBase, as opposed to people like me who's never
experienced those situations?
Set
> Paul Beach wrote:Hi Lester, you - if anyone - could really complete the picture by
>
> > Like you I tend to do most of my coding in C/C++ and Java.
> > But we standardized on Delphi 6 for IBReplicator... and
> > I don't see any need to buy a newer version of Delphi.
> > It stable and does everything we need.
>
> Just to complete the picture - as someone who never moved *TO*
> Delphi ;) Borland 'end of lifed' C++ Builder 6 but has now back
> peddled, and the next version of Delphi will also have a C++
> personality - some time in the future ...
commenting the bits that Claudio didn't think were possible to change,
but which may bring this whole tread "on-topic":
> I don't think her employer will want to go to FB because they areIf I remember correctly, you were in deep trouble with InterBase some
> standarized on MsSql. Since Alicia worked mostly with IB4.2 years
> ago, I think that based on such experience she wouldn't dare to
> suggest IB/FB for the Ministry of Education, so let's concentrate on
> the programming tool for now.
years ago, but in the end finally succeeded (to a large extent due to
IBO?). Doesn't that put you in a position where you're able to talk to
people burnt by InterBase, as opposed to people like me who's never
experienced those situations?
Set