Subject | Re[2]: [Firebird-general] Only second |
---|---|
Author | Mpu Gondrong |
Post date | 2005-02-07T09:59:01Z |
Minggu, 06/02/2005 18:53:09, Paul menulis:
PV> with 405, Firebird was runner-up with 403. What's disappointing is
Win is win, why didn't you accept that? I've seen many talking about
MySQL, news, votes, polls, etc..., in Firebird list, showing Firebird
is 'good enough for everyone'. Is it that important?
I'm using both MySQL and Firebird, and I WILL vote for MySQL, but I
didn't, because I don't know and care about votes.
Tertanda,
Oguds [36856104]
>> http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/showthread.php?s=&threadid=272098PV> Not as much as that. Last year there were 1111 votes. MySQL "won"
PV> with 405, Firebird was runner-up with 403. What's disappointing is
Win is win, why didn't you accept that? I've seen many talking about
MySQL, news, votes, polls, etc..., in Firebird list, showing Firebird
is 'good enough for everyone'. Is it that important?
I'm using both MySQL and Firebird, and I WILL vote for MySQL, but I
didn't, because I don't know and care about votes.
Tertanda,
Oguds [36856104]