Subject | Re: Firebird corrupts databases more often? |
---|---|
Author | Alexander V.Nevsky |
Post date | 2004-01-25T14:10:13Z |
--- In Firebird-general@yahoogroups.com, Helen Borrie <helebor@t...> wrote:
One more addition especially for CS: killing "hanged" processes as a regular practice. IMO most dangerous is to kill select which
runs on very garbaged data - DML changes are transaction-protected, physical garbage collection - not.
Best regards,
Alexander.
> >Is CS on Linux (or even Windows) the way to go for maximum reliability?[skip]
> fwiw, known sources of corruption (meaning busted databases that need[skip]
> tweezers and Lysol to repair) are:
One more addition especially for CS: killing "hanged" processes as a regular practice. IMO most dangerous is to kill select which
runs on very garbaged data - DML changes are transaction-protected, physical garbage collection - not.
Best regards,
Alexander.