Subject | RE: [Firebird-general] Firebird corrupts databases more often? |
---|---|
Author | Leyne, Sean |
Post date | 2004-01-16T18:25:34Z |
Ann,
My message should have mentioned that those settings are for Win32
installs.
Your message, however, could have been construed to mean that v1.5
ensured no loss of data. I was trying to be more "emphatic" about the
conditions to ensure no loss.
Sean
> >My vote: Always use Forced Writes and UPS, regardless of version!due
> >
> >The v1.5 changes only reduced the amount of data which would be lost
> >to power loss -- it did not eliminate data loss.missing
>
> Yes, that's true. But I've never seen a Linux database that had a
> TIP, which is the hallmark of too much stuff stuck in cache. Thewindows
> problem is really that busy pages _never_ get written out and TIPstend to
> be busy.My apologizes, you're quite right!
My message should have mentioned that those settings are for Win32
installs.
> Forcing a cache flush from time to time should greatly reduceAgreed.
> the damage innocents can do to themselves.
Your message, however, could have been construed to mean that v1.5
ensured no loss of data. I was trying to be more "emphatic" about the
conditions to ensure no loss.
Sean