Thomas,

I think that everyone's opinion is valid and important.

My experience dates back over a year. And my issue wasn't SERIOUS problems, it was the number of fixes and version updates (as can be doucmented from the version history of IBO and the IBO newsgroup archives). My decision was also based on the fact that the vast majority of the components were of no interest to me. I felt that a library that included just data access components was of more value to me.

Glad to hear you opinion

ed



________________________________________

On 4/15/2002 at 2:07 PM iblogmanager wrote:

>Ed,
>
>a history of bugs? I'm using IBO now for 1 year and I haven't
>encountered any serious problem so far, so I can say, that they are
>rock solid for me.
>
>I think that my experience is worth hearing too.
>
>Regards,
>Thomas Steinmaurer
>http://www.iblogmanager.com
>
>
>--- In IBDI@y..., "Ed Malloy" <edm@B...> wrote:
>> David,
>>
>> It is my opinion, and appareently Jason agrees that the IBO have a
>history of bugs. no one seems to dispute this. I don't think it is
>necessary to go back and document the many examples which appeared
>(and I bet probably still do appear) in the IBO news groups.
>>
>> I have ho problem Jason, nor with anyone who choses to use the IBO
>softward and I do believe that the bugs get fixed in due time.
>>
>> It is simply my opinion for me that I have had a much better
>experience with IBX. The have been easy to use, and rock-solid for
>me.
>>
>> I think that my experience is worth hearing.
>>
>> ed
>>
>> ________________________________________
>>
>> On 4/12/2002 at 9:20 PM David Jencks wrote:
>>
>> >Not that he needs my support, but I'm with Jason on this one. I
>thought
>> >Jason was being pretty polite. This guy seems to have had plenty
>of time
>> >for years to voice his opinion repeatedly, over and over again,
>that he
>> >doesn't like something about Jason or his software, but won't
>supply even
>> >one example? FUD FUD FUD.
>> >
>> >david jencks
>> >
>> >On 2002.04.12 19:53:47 -0400 R. Tulloch wrote:
>> >> Hi:
>> >>
>> >> > If you are not willing to technically substantiate your
>claims, keep
>> >> your
>> >> > political trash talk to yourself. I've heard enough of it and
>I think
>> >> the
>> >> > community has too.
>> >>
>> >> After your comments and attitude I have not heard enough of it.
>> >> Perhaps it
>> >> should be directed more toward you.
>> >>
>> >> You are the one off the deep end here. He voiced a personal
>opinion
>> >> that I did not
>> >> see as sufficient to warrant you comment "keep your political
>trash
>> >> talk to yourself".
>> >>
>> >> Lighten up.
>> >>
>> >> Community email addresses:
>> >> Post message: IBDI@y...
>> >> Subscribe: IBDI-subscribe@y...
>> >> Unsubscribe: IBDI-unsubscribe@y...
>> >> List owner: IBDI-owner@y...
>> >>
>> >> Shortcut URL to this page:
>> >> http://www.yahoogroups.com/community/IBDI
>> >>
>> >> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
>http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >Community email addresses:
>> > Post message: IBDI@y...
>> > Subscribe: IBDI-subscribe@y...
>> > Unsubscribe: IBDI-unsubscribe@y...
>> > List owner: IBDI-owner@y...
>> >
>> >Shortcut URL to this page:
>> > http://www.yahoogroups.com/community/IBDI
>> >
>> >Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
>http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>>
>> ________________________________________
>
>
>Community email addresses:
> Post message: IBDI@yahoogroups.com
> Subscribe: IBDI-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
> Unsubscribe: IBDI-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> List owner: IBDI-owner@yahoogroups.com
>
>Shortcut URL to this page:
> http://www.yahoogroups.com/community/IBDI
>
>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

________________________________________