Subject | Re: [IBDI] Which license(s)? |
---|---|
Author | Svein Erling Tysvær |
Post date | 2000-03-31T09:25:16Z |
At 15:04 30.03.2000 -0500, Ann Harrison wrote:
Two small comments though:
The definition of "Commercial Use" (1.0.1) is a bit wider than I'm used to.
It just says "...distribution ... making ... available..." and doesn't
mention anything commercial.
Section 3.6 probably has a spelling mistake on line 10 (at least line 10 of
my printout): "...and hat the license..." should be "...and that the
license..."?
Set
>The attachment to this message is a draft copy of the InterbaseWow, more than enough to confuse a simple Norwegian programmer :=)
>Public License for your review and comment. Section 6.4 (slightly
>scrambled in the translation to HTML) is a list of the differences
>between the Mozilla 1.1 license and the Interbase 1.0 license.
Two small comments though:
The definition of "Commercial Use" (1.0.1) is a bit wider than I'm used to.
It just says "...distribution ... making ... available..." and doesn't
mention anything commercial.
Section 3.6 probably has a spelling mistake on line 10 (at least line 10 of
my printout): "...and hat the license..." should be "...and that the
license..."?
Set