Subject | RE: [IBDI] Source under NDA |
---|---|
Author | Alan McDonald |
Post date | 2000-03-13T07:35:55Z |
a "private build" sounds just what the doctor ordered ... says developer
(panting impatiently)
(panting impatiently)
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Ann Harrison [mailto:harrison@...]
>Sent: Monday, 13 March 2000 8:28
>To: IBDI@onelist.com; ibdi@onelist.com
>Subject: Re: [IBDI] Source under NDA
>
>
>From: Ann Harrison <harrison@...>
>
>
>>Why can't the Source code be released under a tempory NDA to build up the
>>knowledge base for when the source comes out for real?
>
>That's and interesting thought and one I'd like to pass back
>to the community. Here are the things that need to be done
>before the code is released, officially.
>
> References to licensing must be removed.
>
> Conditional code for obsolete ports, etc. must be removed.
>
> The build procedures must be fixed so it will build on
> systems other than the ones in Scotts Valley.
>
>Only the last one will take any significant amount of time.
>
>Would there be value to a "private release" before the build
>procedures were fixed?
>
>Ann
>
>
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>MAXIMIZE YOUR CARD, MINIMIZE YOUR RATE!
>Get a NextCard Visa, in 30 seconds! Get rates as low as
>0.0% Intro or 9.9% Fixed APR and no hidden fees.
>Apply NOW!
>http://click.egroups.com/1/2122/2/_/679568/_/952897530/
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>Community email addresses:
> Post message: IBDI@onelist.com
> Subscribe: IBDI-subscribe@onelist.com
> Unsubscribe: IBDI-unsubscribe@onelist.com
> List owner: IBDI-owner@onelist.com
>
>Shortcut URL to this page:
> http://www.onelist.com/community/IBDI