Subject | Interbase's new Licence |
---|---|
Author | Lothian.Nicholas@lmsol.com.au |
Post date | 2000-01-14T00:03:12Z |
In a thread in the news group borland.public.delphi.non-technical, John
Kaster says:
(From
http://x41.deja.com/getdoc.xp?AN=569197012&CONTEXT=947803820.1573191709&hitnum
1)
--------------
about the issue.
--------------
MPL is the Mozilla public licence. It would mean Interbase would be free to
deploy, or could be sold. It would also put no restrictions on the
platforms it could be developed for, and allows forking.
Regards
Nick Lothian
Kaster says:
(From
http://x41.deja.com/getdoc.xp?AN=569197012&CONTEXT=947803820.1573191709&hitnum
1)
--------------
>I don't know for sure, but I would predict MPL knowing the way Dale feels
> It doesn't tell us. Does Open Source mean Open Licence?
>
about the issue.
--------------
MPL is the Mozilla public licence. It would mean Interbase would be free to
deploy, or could be sold. It would also put no restrictions on the
platforms it could be developed for, and allows forking.
Regards
Nick Lothian