Subject | Recommendation for a c++ profiler? |
---|---|
Author | Mark O'Donohue |
Post date | 2008-12-26T01:41:33Z |
On Thu, Dec 25, 2008 at 1:05 AM, Dmitry Yemanov
<dimitr@...> wrote:
windows and unix?
I used to use g++ gprof, but looking around a month ago, it seems that
g++/gprof still does not work well with threads.
I find it is always good to look at the real data, sometimes there is
a surprise hidden in there.
Cheers - Mark
<dimitr@...> wrote:
> paulruizendaal wrote:Does anyone have a recommendation for a good c++ profiler, both
>>
>> If the observations on that page are correct, than FB would benefit
>> from refactoring 'looper' (essentially a parse tree walker coroutine)
>> into a byte-code engine.
>
> I wouldn't be so optimistic. Let's analyze what runtime performance
> costs do they eliminate:
>
windows and unix?
I used to use g++ gprof, but looking around a month ago, it seems that
g++/gprof still does not work well with threads.
I find it is always good to look at the real data, sometimes there is
a surprise hidden in there.
Cheers - Mark