Subject | Re: [Firebird-Architect] Recommendation for a c++ profiler? |
---|---|
Author | Jim Starkey |
Post date | 2008-12-26T15:07:09Z |
Mark O'Donohue wrote:
profiler gets. You should have no trouble finding documentation.
--
Jim Starkey
President, NimbusDB, Inc.
978 526-1376
> On Thu, Dec 25, 2008 at 1:05 AM, Dmitry YemanovI can't help you on Windows, but oprofile on Linux is about a good as a
> <dimitr@...> wrote:
>
>> paulruizendaal wrote:
>>
>>> If the observations on that page are correct, than FB would benefit
>>> from refactoring 'looper' (essentially a parse tree walker coroutine)
>>> into a byte-code engine.
>>>
>> I wouldn't be so optimistic. Let's analyze what runtime performance
>> costs do they eliminate:
>>
>>
>
> Does anyone have a recommendation for a good c++ profiler, both
> windows and unix?
>
> I used to use g++ gprof, but looking around a month ago, it seems that
> g++/gprof still does not work well with threads.
>
> I find it is always good to look at the real data, sometimes there is
> a surprise hidden in there.
>
>
profiler gets. You should have no trouble finding documentation.
--
Jim Starkey
President, NimbusDB, Inc.
978 526-1376