Subject | Re: The POSITION |
---|---|
Author | m_theologos |
Post date | 2006-10-03T09:02:49Z |
--- In Firebird-Architect@yahoogroups.com, Milan Babuskov
<milanb@...> wrote:
with it.
But researching other things, I discovered that the code which
POSITION can use is already (in a big proportion) in the code-base
and I suggested that this can be used to implement, with ease, the
new function. If it needed to implement from scratch, or is a big
effort to do it, I agree, for sure, with you. But we must consider
some things about UDFs:
1. Are great way to extend with ease your server
2. Are not cross-platform
3. (At least for STRPOS) aren't officialy supported by Firebird
foundation.
4. Performance penality
5. Some limitations in some constructs (arguments mainly)
HTH,
m. Th.
<milanb@...> wrote:
>give
> m_theologos wrote:
> > In all my posts I try to be as efficient as I can, pointing out
> > features which can be implemented relatively quick in order to
> > to the market what is needed _now_I understand very well your position and I agree in the most part
>
> There are UDF libraries available _now_ that solve the need for
> POSITION. Why not use those, and let developers spend time on other
> important issues?
>
>
> --
> Milan Babuskov
> http://swoes.blogspot.com/
> http://www.flamerobin.org
>
with it.
But researching other things, I discovered that the code which
POSITION can use is already (in a big proportion) in the code-base
and I suggested that this can be used to implement, with ease, the
new function. If it needed to implement from scratch, or is a big
effort to do it, I agree, for sure, with you. But we must consider
some things about UDFs:
1. Are great way to extend with ease your server
2. Are not cross-platform
3. (At least for STRPOS) aren't officialy supported by Firebird
foundation.
4. Performance penality
5. Some limitations in some constructs (arguments mainly)
HTH,
m. Th.