Subject | Re: [IB-Architect] providers rejects interbase for hosting |
---|---|
Author | Dmitry Kuzmenko |
Post date | 2001-03-22T13:00:03Z |
Hello, Vince!
Vince Duggan wrote:
names and so can't connect to them and fill with garbage objects.
Also I don't think that limiting disk space for FreeBSD is not a problem.
So, there was a misunderstanding of "Interbase providing" model, I think.
databases and connect to them was correct.
--
Dmitry Kuzmenko, Epsylon Technologies.
Vince Duggan wrote:
> I can see their problem, but one should not allow anyone direct access to theI've pointed them that different applications will not know other database
> database. If you do not have direct access, then you cannot execute the commands
> to create tables, databases etc. All database access is 'hidden' in the web app,
> i.e by using PHP, Perl or something similar.
names and so can't connect to them and fill with garbage objects.
Also I don't think that limiting disk space for FreeBSD is not a problem.
So, there was a misunderstanding of "Interbase providing" model, I think.
> It is simple enough to prevent anyone from connecting directly to the databaseof course. But, generally a question about limiting user rights to create
> from outside: block port 3050 for example.
databases and connect to them was correct.
--
Dmitry Kuzmenko, Epsylon Technologies.