|Subject||RE: [IB-Architect] OT: IB6 readiness...opinions solicited|
> From: Willi Krenn [mailto:Willibald.Krenn@...]Hi,
> > IMHO very ready, I have been using it since the first betaNever had this, and I have some big databases (10Mb with no data), has
> about a year ago,
> > and it is at least as stable/solid as 5.6
> Hm, I cannot agree with this completely...
> *) backup-restore are not that stable as in 5.6 (backed a DB with 6.0 -
> everytime restore began to write the Domains the server crashed;
anyone else come across this? The only backup/restore problem I know of is
with IBConsole, but that's a pile of Poo anyway.
> *) The InterbaseClient has a big problem with the local-protocolDo you mean gds32? we have had up to 200 concurrent connections on a local
> and multiple simultanous (threaded) connections!
machine (Webserver) before things started taking a turn for the worst, but
AFAIK, this was more down to the OS than IB
> *) IBConsole is pre-Beta..Don't need it, don't use it.
Maybe we need to have a list somewhere of possible bugs, as well as
successful deployments. I been reading every IB newsgroup, and have not
heard of these two.