At 12:16 PM 6/13/00 -0700, Jason Wharton wrote:

>I had considered examining the BLR for these blr_stall tokens but it seems
>that the byte code of BLR doesn't guarantee that you can isolate the
>existence of the blr_stall command from other arbitrary bytes. The BLR would
>have to be parsed and the context considered before you could declare that
>the byte for blr_stall was actually a suspend. It could also be a binary
>portion of a text identifier or number, etc.

Right, but we have several blr parsers in the code - the most
appropriate might be the one that the "pretty printer" uses.
However, stall is also generated for exit, so an execute procedure
could easily have more than one stall.

>Wouldn't it be cool if we could tame BLR a little in an editor and write
>some procedures using BLR?

You'll find code for that in QLI and gpre.

Ann