Subject | Re: [IB-Architect] Fw: Mischievous SYSDBA |
---|---|
Author | Dalton Calford |
Post date | 2000-05-30T17:19:09Z |
Hi Jim,
make the change to gbak to include the key without telling the local
administrator the key.
Or, use the server side api (since the person would have to connect to
the database first to implement it) to back up the database.
mechinism?
best regards
Dalton
> Problem: gbak will need the key (or whatever) to access the restrictionSince the programmer will have access to the source of GBAK, they can
> portion of the database. Unless we can come up with something tricky,
> this means giving the key to the system administrator, who is the one
> we're trying to protect the data from.
make the change to gbak to include the key without telling the local
administrator the key.
Or, use the server side api (since the person would have to connect to
the database first to implement it) to back up the database.
> Does this mean that the protection mechanism must work throughIs there any extensions to ODBC that would support a encryption
> sanctioned program using these interfaces? Defining something
> that is accessible through ODBC is quite a different beast than
> something limited to the native API.
mechinism?
best regards
Dalton