Subject | RE: [IB-Architect] SuperServer IB and SMP |
---|---|
Author | Leyne, Sean |
Post date | 2000-04-24T20:09:48Z |
Andi,
Thanks for pointing out a missing key phrase in my posting.
Could someone please outline the issues related to getting IB
_SuperServer_ to support SMP 'properly' along with a "gut" judgment on
the complexity involved for each issue.
Sean
-----Original Message-----
From: Andi Kleen [mailto:ak@...]
Sent: Monday, April 24, 2000 4:05 PM
To: IB-Architect@egroups.com
Subject: Re: [IB-Architect] IB and SMP
Thanks for pointing out a missing key phrase in my posting.
Could someone please outline the issues related to getting IB
_SuperServer_ to support SMP 'properly' along with a "gut" judgment on
the complexity involved for each issue.
Sean
-----Original Message-----
From: Andi Kleen [mailto:ak@...]
Sent: Monday, April 24, 2000 4:05 PM
To: IB-Architect@egroups.com
Subject: Re: [IB-Architect] IB and SMP
On Mon, Apr 24, 2000 at 03:50:22PM -0400, Leyne, Sean wrote:
> I'm not sure if this has been asked before or if this is the right
> forum/group to post this in but...
>
> Could someone please outline the issues related to getting IB to
support
> SMP 'properly' along with a "gut" judgement on the complexity involved
> for each issue.
As far as I understand it the IB classic architecture - which starts one
process per connection and only shares locking - is already very SMP
friendly. The processes don't share much.
-Andi
------------------------------------------------------------------------
IT Professionals: Match your unique skills with the best IT projects at
http://click.egroups.com/1/3381/3/_/830676/_/956606755/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
IB-Architect-unsubscribe@onelist.com