Subject | Re: [IB-Architect] IB and SMP |
---|---|
Author | Andi Kleen |
Post date | 2000-04-24T20:05:25Z |
On Mon, Apr 24, 2000 at 03:50:22PM -0400, Leyne, Sean wrote:
process per connection and only shares locking - is already very SMP
friendly. The processes don't share much.
-Andi
> I'm not sure if this has been asked before or if this is the rightAs far as I understand it the IB classic architecture - which starts one
> forum/group to post this in but...
>
> Could someone please outline the issues related to getting IB to support
> SMP 'properly' along with a "gut" judgement on the complexity involved
> for each issue.
process per connection and only shares locking - is already very SMP
friendly. The processes don't share much.
-Andi