Subject | Re: [IB-Architect] UDF replacement: native shared libraries vs. Java |
---|---|
Author | Tim Uckun |
Post date | 2000-04-07T05:39:34Z |
At 12:09 AM 4/7/00 -0300, you wrote:
What if instead of having triggers and stored procedures the database could
send events or signals. that way your code could hook into the database
events yet be running outside the database altogether. Of course this could
also be completely language neutral so you could code in PERL if you wanted
to..
Leave the database engine light and simple.
----------------------------------------------
Tim Uckun
Mobile Intelligence Unit.
----------------------------------------------
"There are some who call me TIM?"
----------------------------------------------
>I know I will run code *I* write on IB. UDFs are a great way to addJust thinking out loud here...
>functionality to an existing database; I certainly wouldn't want to
>recompile my database server because I want an extra function.
What if instead of having triggers and stored procedures the database could
send events or signals. that way your code could hook into the database
events yet be running outside the database altogether. Of course this could
also be completely language neutral so you could code in PERL if you wanted
to..
Leave the database engine light and simple.
----------------------------------------------
Tim Uckun
Mobile Intelligence Unit.
----------------------------------------------
"There are some who call me TIM?"
----------------------------------------------