Subject | Re: [IB-Architect] Thread-safety of gds32.dll |
---|---|
Author | Helen Borrie |
Post date | 2000-12-20T14:43:58Z |
At 08:35 AM 20-12-00 -0500, you wrote:
commercial environment using IB 5.1 that has about 70 users talking to a
middleware connected using the 1-user LIBS developer licence as shipped
with Delphi 4 C/s (i.e. no remote licensing.) I was just curious about
the thought that gds32.dll might have been deliberately crippled to make
this dangerous (as well as illegal).
H.
All for Open and Open for All
InterBase Developer Initiative ยท http://www.interbase2000.org
_______________________________________________________
>No conspiracy, Helen. Threads didn't exist when I wrote theWhoa, no conspiracy implied. Just that I've seen a 3-tier system in a
>engine. When Borland acquired the product only one OS supported
>threads (Apollo).
commercial environment using IB 5.1 that has about 70 users talking to a
middleware connected using the 1-user LIBS developer licence as shipped
with Delphi 4 C/s (i.e. no remote licensing.) I was just curious about
the thought that gds32.dll might have been deliberately crippled to make
this dangerous (as well as illegal).
>If Borland had intended it to be thread un-safe, I'm sure it wouldNow, now...be nice.
>be thread safe today.
H.
All for Open and Open for All
InterBase Developer Initiative ยท http://www.interbase2000.org
_______________________________________________________