Subject | RE: [IB-Architect] System table change |
---|---|
Author | Griffin, Patrick J. |
Post date | 2000-11-07T18:19Z |
I think this is a great idea.
...pat
-----Original Message-----
From: Ann Harrison [mailto:harrison@...]
Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2000 11:56 AM
To: IB-Architect@egroups.com; 'IB-Architect@egroups.com'
Subject: RE: [IB-Architect] System table change
At 11:41 AM 11/7/2000 -0500, Griffin, Patrick J. wrote:
interfaces like ODBC, IBO, etc. to handle numbers
better. When we keep precision, we can also enforce
the limits of the numeric type (another great leap
backward toward standards).
Regards,
Ann
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
IB-Architect-unsubscribe@onelist.com
...pat
-----Original Message-----
From: Ann Harrison [mailto:harrison@...]
Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2000 11:56 AM
To: IB-Architect@egroups.com; 'IB-Architect@egroups.com'
Subject: RE: [IB-Architect] System table change
At 11:41 AM 11/7/2000 -0500, Griffin, Patrick J. wrote:
>So,Right. And the purpose is to make it possible for
>
>create table test1 (
> field1 integer,
> field2 numeric(9),
> field3 decimal(4,2));
>
>They are all integers, but
>
>field1 gets a subtype of 0
>field2 gets a subtype of 1
>field3 gets a subtype of 2
>
>Do I understand this correctly?
interfaces like ODBC, IBO, etc. to handle numbers
better. When we keep precision, we can also enforce
the limits of the numeric type (another great leap
backward toward standards).
Regards,
Ann
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
IB-Architect-unsubscribe@onelist.com