Artur Anjos wrote:

> The best approach that I find to this problem was to "keep it under our
> control": we rebuild the schema cache, zip all files, and put it on the
> database as a blob.
> Clients update the schema cache from that blob. This is amazing fast,
> and is completely in your control.
>

Sounds neat, Arthur. But if the clients are to access the BLOB would
they not have to read at least a part of the SchemaCache in order to do
that?

/Dany