Subject | Re: R: R: R: R: R: [IBO] for Jason: TIBOQuery vs. TFIBDataset speed test |
---|---|
Author | Carlos H. Cantu |
Post date | 2005-05-27T12:38:57Z |
ER> 1) you don't have any performance problem at opening time also if you
ER> try to open some query with a lot of fields ?
In general, no. But in some circunstances (read as connection over
internet) it can be a bit slow.
Anyway, due to the complexibility and inteligence inside IBO, it tends
to be a bit more slow (in some situations) compared to other
technologies like FIBPlus or dbExpress.
ER> 2) in your database design do you use a lot of DOMAIN definition
ER> or none?
Usually I use domains to simulate booleans values and to handle
monetary values.
ER> 3) do you use TBooleanFields ? You have set FieldEntryType = [] or
ER> FieldEntryType = [fetDomainName] in your Connection component?
No, my "boolean" fields are standard Delphi TStrinField.
[]s
Cantu
http://www.warmboot.com.br
FireBase - http://www.FireBase.com.br
ER> try to open some query with a lot of fields ?
In general, no. But in some circunstances (read as connection over
internet) it can be a bit slow.
Anyway, due to the complexibility and inteligence inside IBO, it tends
to be a bit more slow (in some situations) compared to other
technologies like FIBPlus or dbExpress.
ER> 2) in your database design do you use a lot of DOMAIN definition
ER> or none?
Usually I use domains to simulate booleans values and to handle
monetary values.
ER> 3) do you use TBooleanFields ? You have set FieldEntryType = [] or
ER> FieldEntryType = [fetDomainName] in your Connection component?
No, my "boolean" fields are standard Delphi TStrinField.
[]s
Cantu
http://www.warmboot.com.br
FireBase - http://www.FireBase.com.br