Subject | IB_Grid and SrollBar issues. |
---|---|
Author | Daniel Jimenez |
Post date | 2005-03-16T21:45:26Z |
Hi,
On the 18th of January 2005, "melr_la" posted the following message, could
someone advise me of the outcome/solution, as we are having the same
problem. I have browsed the archive, but have fail to find a reply.
we try this work-around, we are not seen the required behaviour.
Thank you
daniel
____________________________
Comvision Pty. Ltd.
www.comvision.net.au
On the 18th of January 2005, "melr_la" posted the following message, could
someone advise me of the outcome/solution, as we are having the same
problem. I have browsed the archive, but have fail to find a reply.
>I encounter the following user interface quirks with IB_grid whenWe are using BCB 5 and have the same issues.
>used with Delphi.
>The post mention that using last and first was a work-around. However, when
>1) When displaying a moderate to a large amount of information
>retrieved by a query, the IB_grid slider in the vertical scrollbar at
>first indicates that perhaps half the available rows are being
>displayed, even if only about 1% of the rows are actually being
>displayed. This is misleading. How can the scrollbar be made to
>give a more accurate graphical representation of the number of rows
>being displayed by the grid?
>
>2) When displaying a moderate to a large amount of information
>retrieved by a query, when scrolling down the IB_grid vertical
>scrollbar quickly shrinks and drops to (nearly) the bottom even
>though many rows remain to be displayed. Much of the downward
>vertical scrolling can then be done with no apparent visual change to
>the scrollbar and there is effectively no vertical movement to the
>scrollbar for most of the continued downward vertical scrolling.
>This is misleading, and it makes it difficult to quickly scroll to
>the bottom or to rows in the latter portion of those retrieved. How
>can the scrollbar position be made to give a more accurate graphical
>representation of the position of the rows shown relative to the
>overall number of rows retrieved?
>
we try this work-around, we are not seen the required behaviour.
Thank you
daniel
____________________________
Comvision Pty. Ltd.
www.comvision.net.au