>>> Why are you leaving the ib_transaction property blank?

In my application, I have 2 situations where data is manipulated. I
have users entering data and I have a batch process that runs
periodially to perform some updates. The batch process is controlled
by a transaction. For all of the data entriy items I've left the
transaction blank. How should I handle this?

--- In IBObjects@yahoogroups.com, Helen Borrie <helebor@t...> wrote:
> At 07:26 AM 17/03/2004 +0000, you wrote:
> >In an application, I have two components pointing to the same data
> >table in Firebird 1.5.
> >
> >The first component is a TIBOTable and is part of an explicit
> >transaction which commits a value "Y" to the table. Just after the
> >commit, a TIB_Cursor pointed at the same data opens. It has nothing
> >listed in the "IB_transaction" property. The cursor is active but sees
> >the just commited value as blank. Why would this happen?
>
> It will be using the default transaction. With TIBO*, the isolation
level
> of the default transaction is tiConcurrency. It won't see what another
> transaction committed until itself is committed.
>
> Why are you leaving the ib_transaction property blank?
>
> Helen