Subject | Re: [IBO] ISAPI / multithread |
---|---|
Author | stewartbourke |
Post date | 2003-06-24T22:45:14Z |
I think I have figured it out - I should use ibq:=tiboquery.create
(ib_session1) ??
COuld you confirm?
thanks,
Stewart Bourke
--- In IBObjects@yahoogroups.com, "stewartbourke"
<stewartbourke@e...> wrote:
(ib_session1) ??
COuld you confirm?
thanks,
Stewart Bourke
--- In IBObjects@yahoogroups.com, "stewartbourke"
<stewartbourke@e...> wrote:
> Helen,during
>
> One last thing which has just come up in relation to this.
>
> In my webmodule, I create quote a number of queries on the fly
> the execution of my DLL. Do I have to do anything with thesequeries
> in terms of attaching them to the session - bearing in mind theyare
> IBOQUERIES?127.0.0.1
>
> Thanks again,
>
> Stewart Bourke
> --- In IBObjects@yahoogroups.com, Helen Borrie <helebor@t...> wrote:
> > At 12:29 PM 24/06/2003 +0000, you wrote:
> > >Helen,
> > >
> > >Thanks for that.
> > >
> > >One very quick point of clarification - can I reference
> inIP
> > >the connection string, or must it be 'localhost'?
> >
> > That depends on the Winsock version. Winsock 2 supports direct
> addressfact
> > resolution. Winsock 1 doesn't. For Win95 you need the Windows !
> Plus
> > upgrade 2 (or is it 3?) to get Winsock 2 support. I think the
> initial
> > distro of Win98 had Winsock 1. 98SE has 2.
> >
> > In any case, host name said to be faster on Windows, because it
> gets
> > matched directly to the stored IP address and field-by-field mask-
> matching
> > follows. If you use the IP address in the connection string,
> winsock
> > parses it first as a string, breaks out the mask fields and puts
> them back
> > together again before doing the mask evaluation. Why, I don't
> know. I
> > recall someone (maybe Ivan Prenosil) reporting this ridiculous
> from an
> > MSD paper a year or two ago.
> >
> > Helen