Subject | Re: [IBO] How to reduce net traffic on prepare? |
---|---|
Author | Michael Fung <ibo@cmsweb.com> |
Post date | 2003-01-20T13:59:37Z |
Thanks Helen and Lester. I know after the first prepare the
subsequent execute generate very small traffic (about 1K in my
example). However I cannot use this approach due to user requirement
(generate complex where clause criteria by checking many options on a
form), I have to use ad hoc sql statements. I already turned on
schema cache, but it doesn't help much. If there are no such switches
to turn down traffic on IBO, my only option is create a separate web
interface for remote users, which is not too attractive. Argh...:-(
Rgds,
Michael
subsequent execute generate very small traffic (about 1K in my
example). However I cannot use this approach due to user requirement
(generate complex where clause criteria by checking many options on a
form), I have to use ad hoc sql statements. I already turned on
schema cache, but it doesn't help much. If there are no such switches
to turn down traffic on IBO, my only option is create a separate web
interface for remote users, which is not too attractive. Argh...:-(
Rgds,
Michael
--- In IBObjects@yahoogroups.com, Helen Borrie <helebor@t...> wrote:
> At 09:30 AM 20/01/2003 +0000, you wrote:
> >--- In IBObjects@yahoogroups.com, Helen Borrie <helebor@t...>
wrote:
> > > At 08:13 AM 19/01/2003 +0000, you wrote:
> > > >Dear Jason,
> > > >
> > > >I have measured the network traffic generated by a prepare of a
> > > >simple query. It takes about 40Kbytes server to client, and
1Kbytes
> > > >client to server. Since the query is so simple, there
shouldn't be
> > > >such amount of information coming from the server. Is it
possible
> >to
> > > >make IBO to lower the server to client traffic?
> > > >
> > > >Below is the prepare process I captured in the monitor:
> > > >
> > > >19/1/2003 15:58:10 - /*---
> > > >PREPARE STATEMENT
> > > >TR_HANDLE = 4149900
> > > >STMT_HANDLE = 4143644
> > > >
> > > >SELECT ID
> > > > , NAME
> > > > , UNITEST
> > > > , TESTDM
> > > >FROM DUMY
> > > >
> > > >PLAN (DUMY NATURAL)
> > > >
> > > >FIELDS = [ Version 1 SQLd 4 SQLn 30
> > > > DUMY.ID = <NIL>
> > > > DUMY.NAME = <NIL>
> > > > DUMY.UNITEST = <NIL>
> > > > DUMY.TESTDM = <NIL> ]
> > > >
> > > >SECONDS = 1.047
> > > >----*/
> > >
> > > Hello Michael,
> > > Could you begin by providing details of the conditions under
which
> >you
> > > observed this? Since slow performance is a mix of network
> >conditions,
> > > metadata structure and application conditions, without
information
> >it is
> > > impossible to determine what might be causing your problems.
> >
> >Dear Helen,
> >
> >The point is I know the user will use access from place to place,
the
> >network condidtion is sometimes good sometimes poor, I have no
> >control over it. That is why I want to minimize the traffic
required,
> >so that the speed will not be too unbearable during slow
connections
> >(like using modem dialup). Yes, the real challenge here is to make
> >traffic as small as possible. I just hope there is some switches in
> >IBO that can turn down the traffic.
>
> Switches - not. You need a Prepare for the server to validate what
the
> client is asking it to do. But you should design your applications
so that
> a Prepare happens only once. Don't construct ad hoc SQL statements
at
> run-time but use parameters.
>
> If the metadata are stable, try using local metadata caching. It
will add
> some time to connecting, but will reduce the Prepare time of
subsequent
> queries.
>
> If your clients on slow connections are going to be inserting
records, use
> the ColumnAttributes for defaults - don't use GetServerDefaults, as
this
> will really add traffic.
>
> When timing your Prepares, be sure to do your timings *after* the
> connection has been established, otherwise your initial prepare
will have a
> lot of overhead that is not repeated later.
>
> Of course, you know the tricks about indexing, I'm sure, even
though your
> demo query has no primary key.
>
> Are your clients actually logging into a database server across a
dial-up
> connection? This isn't really "on" unless they have broadband:
this kind
> of scenario really calls for n-tier, so that your application
server does
> all the querying and your clients are just lightweight terminals,
sending
> and receiving as few packets as possible across the wire...
>
> Helen