Jason, if he did not made any inversion with '.' and '_', I think he is asking not to omit the relation name, but to return always the "real name" (NAME.RECNUM) instead of the alias one (NAME.NAME_RECNUM) after the relation name.
i.e. he expects that in
Select Name.RecNum AS MainId from Name
FullFieldName property will return
Name.RecNum
while now returns
Name.MainId
Regards
Marco Menardi

--- In IBObjects@y..., "Jason Wharton" <jwharton@i...> wrote:
> I think you have a good point here. I can make it so that it will omit the
> relation name.
>
> Thanks,
> Jason Wharton
> CPS - Mesa AZ
> http://www.ibobjects.com
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "bhatakeyama" <bhatasub5@a...>
> To: <ibobjects@y...>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 11:50 AM
> Subject: [IBO] TIB_Column::FullFieldName
>
>
> > >From the Select statement:
> > Select Name.RecNum From Name
> > the FullFieldName property returns:
> > NAME.RECNUM
> > as I expected.
> >
> > However when I use
> > Select Name.RecNum AS NAME_RECNUM from Name
> > the FullFieldName property returns:
> > NAME.NAME_RECNUM
> >
> > Should not NAME.RECNUM be returned? NAME.NAME_RECNUM is
> > not very useful.
> >
> > bhata