Subject | Re: [IBO] When is KeyRelation necessary? |
---|---|
Author | Nando Dessena |
Post date | 2002-03-12T16:45:57Z |
Helen,
posts (even when they come from someone unable to express himself
clearly like me). ;-)
converting the query to IBO. I am doing quite a fine-grain conversion
process, almost one data module at a time, for reasons this list won't
be interested in.
Currently my goal is to have IBO build the update statements for me -
goal that I have met with KeyRelation and your help.
I meant that currently I only have to mimic (with IBO) BDE behaviour, so
I don't need anything fancier.
BTW, if I were talking about the BDE, would I have posted to this list?
;-)
Ciao
--
____
_/\/ando
> >The *TUpdateSQL*. That was clumsy.Yes. It's amazing what one can discover when he/she actually reads the
>
> Who was talking about TUpdateSQL? Were you?
posts (even when they come from someone unable to express himself
clearly like me). ;-)
> Didn't you use the xxxSQL properties, then?No. I had to use a TUpdateSQL with the BDE; I have now ditched it after
converting the query to IBO. I am doing quite a fine-grain conversion
process, almost one data module at a time, for reasons this list won't
be interested in.
> You can in IBO, tooI'll take note. What is the syntax, please?
> but why would you need to?In time I may be able to figure out an actual requirement for that.
Currently my goal is to have IBO build the update statements for me -
goal that I have met with KeyRelation and your help.
> >WRT multi-table update, I don't think I am going to need anything theAgain, I have left a door (wide?) open to misinterpretation, sorry.
> >BDE can not do, at least in the short term. My requirements now are
> >pretty easy to meet. :-)
>
> Oh, and I thought you were using IBO. How extraordinary.
I meant that currently I only have to mimic (with IBO) BDE behaviour, so
I don't need anything fancier.
BTW, if I were talking about the BDE, would I have posted to this list?
;-)
Ciao
--
____
_/\/ando